人類真的登上過月球嗎?

Jake Williams
Let me get this straight.
People say man didn't really land on the moon. They say that somehow, billions of dollars were sunk into a project whereby the worlds largest hoax occurred. Giant rockets that didn't actually go anywhere were launched multiple times in front of people, while hundreds of other people pretended to be mission control, astronauts, film crews, and everyone else shown. Every news industry on the planet was either in on it, or completely fooled. The USSR, who were spending billions spying on America, found no evidence of this hoax, and bought it. And, to top it off, in the 47 years since not a single person, out of the hundreds of people who must be in on it, have come forward despite the massive opportunity for fame and fortune. Oh, and the reflector is actually a naturally occurring phenomenon, not a clear example of human engineering.
I'm sorry, but that would actually be more impressive than landing on the moon.
Yes, we landed on the moon, not because it was easy, but because tricking everyone into thinking we did would be freaking impossible.

讓我來梳理一下這個觀點。
有人說人類并沒有真正登上月球。他們聲稱，數(shù)十億美元被投入到一個項目中，世界上最大的騙局就這樣發(fā)生了。那些實際上并沒有飛往任何地方的巨型火箭被多次在人們面前發(fā)射，同時還有許多其他人假裝是任務(wù)控制中心、宇航員、電影工作人員以及在畫面中出現(xiàn)的其他人。地球上的每一個新聞行業(yè)要么參與其中，要么完全被愚弄了。蘇聯(lián)，這個在花費數(shù)十億進行對美國間諜活動的國家，沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)這個騙局的任何證據(jù)，并且也相信了它。而且，最重要的是，在過去的47年里，盡管有巨大的名利機會，但那些必須參與其中的人，沒有一個人站出來揭露真相。哦，還有，那個反射器實際上是自然現(xiàn)象，這可不是人類工程學(xué)的典型例子。
我很抱歉，但如果這是真的，那實際上比登陸月球還要令人印象深刻。
是的，我們確實登上了月球，并不是因為這很容易，而是因為讓每個人都相信我們做到了這一點是極其不可能的。

Ernest W. Adams
Did the US really land on the Moon?
No, the big secret is that it was actually the Russians, but they used fake American spacecraft in a false flag operation. They sent English-speaking cosmonauts named Neil Armstrongski and Edwin Aldrinovich in order to fool the world into thinking the Americans did it. This was the most glorious disinformation project ever achieved by the KGB. Mikhail Collinsev was made a Hero of the Soviet unx for his support role.
It worked. Americans have been taking the blame for being the first to land on the moon for the last 40+ years. You and I are the only ones who have seen through their nefarious subterfuge.

美國真的登上月球了嗎？
不，最大的秘密是，登上月球的實際上是俄羅斯人，但他們在假國旗行動中使用了假的美國航天器。他們派出了名為Neil Armstrongski和Edwin Aldrinovich且會說英語的宇航員，目的是欺騙世界，讓世界認為是美國人干的。這是克格勃有史以來最輝煌的虛假信息項目。米哈伊爾·科林塞夫因為他的支持作用被封為蘇聯(lián)英雄。
它奏效了。在過去的40多年里，美國人一直認為自己是第一個登上月球的國家。你和我是唯一看穿他們邪惡詭計的人。

Charlie Platt
There was a great interview with Neil Armstrong where he was asked that question, I think in the early 2000s. He responded calmly, and said, he was proud to have been part of one of man’s greatest achievements, the Apollo moon landings. That he understood it was such an amazing achievement, that people might be skeptical and have questions about how it was done, is it possible, etc… Hell, they weren’t even sure it was possible when they started the program.
Then he paused, and thought for a moment, and said, but, oh to have been part of a program that involved hundreds of thousands of people, around the world, with countries like the Soviets trying to prove us a failure constantly, and to have pulled that off and kept it a secret for over 30 years now, then, wow, that would be even more amazing. So regardless of how you look at it, in the 1960s we did something that was truly remarkable.
I would add, what type of world would you want to live in? One where we did amazing and remarkable things, brave men and women risked their lives to reach the moon and space, where the limit of our abilities is equal to the limit of our imagination, or a world where everything is a hoax and a fake. A bit of skepticism is good, keeps people honest

在21世紀初，有一次對尼爾·阿姆斯特朗的精彩采訪，他在采訪中被問到了這個問題。他平靜地回答說，他很自豪能參與人類最偉大的成就之一——阿波羅登月。他明白這是一個令人難以置信的成就，人們可能會對此持懷疑態(tài)度，質(zhì)疑它是如何完成的，是否可能等等……實際上，當他們開始這個項目時，他們甚至不確定這是否可能。
然后他停頓了一下，思考了片刻，說，但是，哦，能夠參與到這個涉及全球數(shù)十萬人的項目中，并且能夠完成這個項目并保守秘密超過30年，那將是更加了不起的——像蘇聯(lián)這樣的國家不斷試圖證明我們的失敗。所以不管你怎么看，在1960年代，我們做了一些真正了不起的事情。
我想補充一句，你想生活在什么樣的世界里?在一個世界里，我們做了了不起的事情，勇敢的男男女女冒著生命危險到達月球和太空，在一個世界里，我們的能力極限等于我們的想象力極限，或者在一個世界里，一切都是騙局和假的？有點懷疑是好的，它讓人們保持誠實。

Paddy Alton
Is it true that humankind visited the Moon?
It’s definitely true; the idea that the moon landings were faked is a well-known conspiracy theory, but is utterly without foundation.
There’s plenty of compelling evidence, e.g. during the Apollo missions the astronauts left behind some mirrors to bounce lasers off in order to measure the Earth-Moon distance more accurately (Lunar Laser Ranging experiment). And that’s even if you don’t believe the reams of footage that was taken. No, in order to believe that we didn’t land on the moon it is necessary to believe:
The USA was willing to build a whole load of extremely expensive rockets, send them to the moon, conduct a pantomime series of landings and manufacture fake footage, somehow also contriving to land the mirror arrays I mentioned on the moon while doing this. Note that we’ve since imaged the landing sites and seen the remnants of the landing (too grainy to really show much, but there’s definitely something there).
That they did this on multiple occasions, aided and abetted by the vast number of NASA employees and external contractors involved with the missions, and no-one let anything slip.
That they did this at the height of the cold war and somehow weren’t found out by e.g. the Russians.
That over the following decades, none of the people who’d have to have been in on it have cracked.
On the other side of the equation are a bunch of people who weren’t involved with the mission analysing the footage and mumbling something about the lighting not looking quite right, while steadfastly ignoring the perfectly reasonable explanations for their various points of contention (e.g. that lighting conditions on the moon are rather different from those on Earth).

人類是否真的登陸過月球？
這絕對是真的；認為登月是假的是一個眾所周知的陰謀論，但它完全沒有根據(jù)。
有很多有力的證據(jù)，例如在阿波羅任務(wù)期間，宇航員留下了一些反射激光的鏡子，以便更準確地測量地月距離（月球激光測距實驗）。即使你不相信拍攝的大量影像資料，這也是事實。不，要相信我們沒有登陸月球，你必須相信：
美國愿意建造一大批極其昂貴的火箭，將它們發(fā)送到月球，進行一系列假的登陸表演并制造假影像，同時還設(shè)法在進行這些活動的同時在月球上放置我提到的鏡子陣列。請注意，我們后來已經(jīng)對登陸地點進行了成像，看到了登陸的殘留物（圖像太模糊，看不太清，但肯定有東西在那里）。
他們在多次任務(wù)中這樣做，得到了大量參與任務(wù)的NASA員工和外部承包商的幫助和支持，而且沒有人泄露任何信息。
他們在冷戰(zhàn)高峰期這樣做，不知何故沒有被例如俄羅斯等國家發(fā)現(xiàn)。
在接下來的幾十年里，所有那些必須參與其中的人都沒有泄露秘密。
在這個問題的另一方面，有一群沒有參與任務(wù)的人在分析影像，喃喃自語地說光線看起來不太對，同時堅定地忽略了他們各種爭議點的完全合理的解釋（例如，月球上的光照條件與地球上的相當不同）。

Jane-Maree Howard
A few months ago, while I was getting some blood tests, the lady performing the procedure happened to mention that her birthday fell on the anniversary of the first moon landing (21 July in New Zealand, 20 July in the US, depends on which side of the International Date Line you're on), & then mentioned that ‘theory’ that the moon landings were faked. I was pleased to be able to offer a brief rebuttal - & may I say how very pleased I am to see the many comprehensive replies to this old canard; I learnt a lot! My sister later pointed out to me that the lady probably got this ‘fake-moon-landing’ rubbish often, & that I'd probably made her day by giving her ammunition to refute it.

幾個月前，當我去做血液檢查時，執(zhí)行檢查的女士偶然提到她的生日恰好是第一次登月紀念日（新西蘭是7月21日，美國是7月20日，這取決于你在國際日期變更線的哪一邊），然后她提到了那個“理論”，即登月是假的。我很高興能夠提出一個簡短的反駁——我可以說，看到針對這一古老謠言的許多全面的答復(fù);我感到非常高興；我學(xué)到了很多！后來，我姐姐向我指出，那位女士可能經(jīng)常聽到這種“假登月”的胡說八道，我給她提供了反駁的論據(jù)，可能讓她的一天變得更好了。

There are far better answers here than mine.
At the time, the Cold War between the Russians & the US was in full spate. Every propaganda point counted, including (& especially!) the Space Race; when President Kennedy announced in a speech (1962*) that the US was going to put a man on the Moon & bring him safely back to Earth ‘before this decade is out’, the Russians were well ahead on points (Sputnik, dog Laika, male cosmonaut Gagarin, & later* female cosmonaut Tereshkova, all in Earth orbit), so the US needed a knock-out blow & the first moon landing was it (the announcement caught NASA by surprise, though they must've known that something pretty big would have to be on the agenda). Not too long after JFK’s announcement, the Russians sent an unmanned probe to orbit the moon & transmit photos back to Earth (& they repeated the procedure some time after the first (& subsequent) landing(s). Now, the die was cast! The US had no choice but to go for broke & do what JFK said they would do.

這里有的答案比我提供的答案更好。
當時，俄羅斯和美國之間的正處于冷戰(zhàn)高潮期。每一個宣傳點都很重要，包括（尤其是）太空競賽；當肯尼迪總統(tǒng)在一次演講中宣布（1962年），美國打算“在這個十年結(jié)束之前”把一個人送上月球并把他安全帶回地球，而當時俄羅斯在系列成就上遙遙領(lǐng)先（斯普特尼克、狗萊卡、男性宇航員加加林，后來的女性宇航員捷列什科娃，都在地球軌道上），所以美國需要發(fā)出致命一擊，第一次登月就是這樣（這一聲明讓美國宇航局感到意外，盡管他們一定知道會有相當大的事情出現(xiàn)在議程上）?？夏岬峡偨y(tǒng)宣布登月后不久，俄羅斯人就發(fā)射了一個無人探測器繞月飛行，并將照片傳回地球(他們在第一次(及隨后的)著陸后一段時間重復(fù)了這一過程)。現(xiàn)在，木已成舟!美國別無選擇，只能孤注一擲，按照肯尼迪所說的去做。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Jon Mixon
Did man really go to moon?
Why can't it be ruled out?
Tens of thousands of people worked on various aspects the Apollo programs - Are they all lying?
Twelve men walked on the moon,brought back lunar samples and took pictures - Are they all lying?
Hundreds of professional and amateur astronomers observed the mission - Were they all deceived or are they lying?
There are reflectors upon the moon which can viewed with telescopes - How did they get there?
The Soviet unx, the United State's mortal enemy at the time, never disputed that the US missions to the moon were anything other than genuine. Given the massive public relations boost that they would have received if even one mission had been fraudulent, why would they have kept anything secret for decades if they knew that it was untrue?
Sorry, but the evidence of the Apollo missions having successfully launched men into space, sent them to the moon and brought them back is so overwhelming that it shifts the burden of proof onto the side of anyone who claims that they did not occur.

人類真的去過月球嗎？
為什么不能排除這種可能性?
成千上萬的人參與了阿波羅計劃的各個方面——他們都在撒謊嗎？
十二名宇航員在月球上行走，帶回了月球樣本并拍攝了照片——他們也都在撒謊嗎？
數(shù)百名專業(yè)和業(yè)余天文學(xué)家觀察了這次任務(wù)——他們都被欺騙了，還是在撒謊？
月球上有可以通過望遠鏡觀察到的反射器——它們是如何到達那里的？
蘇聯(lián)，當時美國的死敵，從來沒有質(zhì)疑過美國的登月計劃是假的。考慮到即使有一個任務(wù)是欺詐性的，他們也會獲得巨大的公共關(guān)系提升，如果他們知道這是不真實的，他們?yōu)槭裁匆Ｊ孛孛軒资昴?
抱歉，阿波羅任務(wù)成功地將人類送入太空、送到月球并帶回地球的證據(jù)是如此確鑿，以至于它將舉證責任轉(zhuǎn)移到了聲稱這些事件沒有發(fā)生過的人身上。

Stephen Perrenod
More than once. Six times in fact.
The kooks, nuts, idiots who say that the Apollo 11 landing was faked generally forget to make up a crazy, insane story about Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, and Apollo 17. Apollo 13 was unable to land.
Twelve American men walked on the Moon’s surface.

不止一次，事實上是六次。
那些說阿波羅11號著陸是偽造的怪人、瘋子和白癡通常忘了編一個關(guān)于阿波羅12號、阿波羅14號、阿波羅15號、阿波羅16號、阿波羅17號和阿波羅13號無法著陸的愚蠢而荒唐的故事。

Erwin Molnar
Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?
I participated in the testing of the Lunar Module propulsion systems and their components in Houston, White Sands, and Bethpage, Long Island. I was also present in the Lunar Module control room in Bethpage during Armstrong’s landing. No amount of self-deception can make me believe that all this took place in a Hollywood studio or that my paychecks were issued by a movie production company.
Every day there are fewer and fewer of us left who actually worked on the Apollo program. However, in a few years this entire discussion will be not only academic, but will be seen as an absurdity. In a few years, when we have permanently colonized the moon, the descent stage of the Apollo 11 Lunar module (designated as LEM-5 during fabrication and test) as well as the surrounding area with the astronauts’ footprints will be protected and designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site (perhaps Interplanetary Heritage Site?).

尼爾·阿姆斯特朗真的登上月球了嗎？
我參加了在休斯敦，白沙，和貝斯佩奇，長島進行的有關(guān)登月艙推進系統(tǒng)及其部件的測試的工作。阿姆斯特朗著陸時，我也在貝斯佩奇登月艙控制室工作。再多的自欺欺人也不能讓我相信這一切都發(fā)生在好萊塢的工作室里，或者我的薪水是由電影制作公司發(fā)的。
真正參與阿波羅計劃的人正變得越來越少。然而，幾年后，這整個討論將不僅是學(xué)術(shù)性的，而且將被視為荒謬的。幾年后，當我們永久地在月球上建立殖民地時，阿波羅11號登月艙的下降階段（在制造和測試期間被指定為LEM-5）以及周圍有宇航員腳印的區(qū)域?qū)⒊蔀槁?lián)合國教科文組織世界遺產(chǎn)地（也許甚至是星際遺產(chǎn)地？）。

Geoffrey Widdison
Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?
Note that the astronauts also left a corner reflector on the moon. Anyone with the right equipment can bounce a laser off that reflector and pick up the reflection. If the moon landing was a hoax, it would have to include everyone on earth with access to a decently powered laser and detection rig over the past forty years.

尼爾·阿姆斯特朗真的登上了月球嗎?
請注意，宇航員還在月球上留下了一個角行反射器。只要有合適的設(shè)備，任何人都可以將激光從反射器上反射回來，并接收到反射。如果登月是一場騙局，那么在過去的四十年里，地球上所有能接觸到大功率激光器和探測設(shè)備的人都必須參與其中。

Katie Anne Holton
Just a few Americans landed there.
The rest of the country stayed home and watched it on TV.

只有少數(shù)美國人在那里登陸。
全國其他地方的人都呆在家里，在電視上觀看它。

Austin Willard Bryan
You can Google real footage from the moon landings where they dropped a hammer and a feather at the same time. Now, on Earth, they hammer falls faster than the feather, despite the gravitational constant supposedly being constant for all obxts, but that actually has to do with our atmosphere, which the moon has not.
Because of that, this was the first time anyone was able to test, and eventually prove, that gravity pulls on all obxts equally.
Check it out, it’s totally bizarre. The hammer and feather fall at the exact same rate!
CG wasn’t around back then and wouldn’t be for more than half a decade. Mythbusters also did a special about the moon as well you might want to check out.

你可以在谷歌上搜索登月的真實畫面，他們同時扔下了一把錘子和一根羽毛。在地球上，錘子比羽毛下落得更快，盡管引力常數(shù)理論上對所有物體都是恒定的，但這實際上與我們的大氣層有關(guān)，而月球上是沒有大氣層的。
正因為如此，這是第一次有人能夠測試并最終證明，引力對所有物體的作用是均等的。
去看看吧，這非常奇怪。錘子和羽毛以完全相同的速度下落！
那時候還沒有計算機生成圖像（CG），而且該技術(shù)還要過半年多才會出現(xiàn)?！渡裨捚平庹摺芬沧隽艘黄陉P(guān)于月球的特別節(jié)目，你可能也想去看看。

John Chapman
Did the US really land on the Moon?
Absolutely not. The US has never moved from it’s position between Canada and Mexico, between the Atlantic and Pacific.
Some astronauts from the US did land on the moon though. Some people appear to believe this was all a gigantic hoax but obviously choose to ignore the fact that thousands would have had to be involved in this ‘hoax’, that worldwide radio telescopes tracked them to the moon (including some in Russia). That equipment was left there which can still be detected today.

美國真的登上月球了嗎？
絕對沒有。美國從未離開過它位于加拿大和墨西哥之間、大西洋和太平洋之間的地理位置。
不過，美國的一些宇航員確實登上了月球。有些人似乎相信這一切都是一場巨大的騙局，但顯然他們選擇忽視了一個事實：成千上萬的人必須參與這個所謂的‘騙局’，全球的射電望遠鏡（包括俄羅斯的一些望遠鏡）都追蹤到了他們到達月球的軌跡。而且這些設(shè)備被留在那里，至今仍能被探測到。

Dhulipala Somayajulu
Surely yes. It would've been easier and cheaper at that time to actually go to moon and take a video than faking a video. The latter would've required technology far beyond the reach at the time the first person set foot on moon. Slow motion cameras required to simulate conditions equivalent 1/6 th of earth's gravity would've required really really long tapes to catch all the detail at such high fps. The processing technology would've costed much more than the technology required to simply shoot it at moon at that time.

當然登上了，在當時，真的去月球拍攝視頻會比偽造視頻更容易、更便宜。后者所需要的技術(shù)遠遠超出了第一個人登上月球時所能接觸到的技術(shù)。為了模擬相當于地球重力六分之一的條件，需要使用慢動作攝影機，這將需要非常非常長的磁帶才能捕捉到如此高幀率下的所有細節(jié)。在當時，這種處理技術(shù)的成本要比簡單地送人上月球所需的技術(shù)要高得多。