網(wǎng)友討論：印度導(dǎo)彈誤射巴基斯坦

Was the misguided Indian missile a way to test the Pak defense system based on China''s HQ-9?

2022-03-19 地平線123 19568 25 1 收藏糾錯&舉報

譯文簡介

網(wǎng)友：這枚導(dǎo)彈（不確定是不是布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈）直到最后一刻都在40000米高空飛行。紅旗9只能在25公里的高度上進行攔截。當(dāng)進入最終階段時，布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈會進行眼鏡蛇式的機動，其速度會達(dá)到4馬赫，做S線運動.......

正文翻譯

網(wǎng)友討論：印度導(dǎo)彈誤射巴基斯坦

評論翻譯

Value Pilgrim
1. The Missile (no confirmation whether it was Brahmos) flew at 40,000 meters till the last moment. The HQ 9 can intercept only an altitude of 25 Kms.
2. When it goes into the terminal phase, Brahmos does something called the cobra maneuver. It does a zig-zagging S at speeds of Mach 4 (or in this case since its plunging from 40 kms probably Mach 5+). Its absolutely impossible to intercept at those speeds and with that S maneuver.

這枚導(dǎo)彈（不確定是不是布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈）直到最后一刻都在40000米高空飛行。紅旗9只能在25公里的高度上進行攔截。
當(dāng)進入最終階段時，布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈會進行眼鏡蛇式的機動，其速度會達(dá)到4馬赫，做S線運動（或者在這種情況下，由于在40000米的高空處下落，速度或許會達(dá)到5馬赫）。以這種速度和難以捉摸的S線的走位是絕對不可能被攔截的

3. The missile wasn't carrying any warhead. If it had, it would flattened a half kilometre square or more. With that kinetic energy and with shrapnel flying in all directions the devastation would have been ridiculous.

這枚導(dǎo)彈沒有攜帶任何彈頭，如果有攜帶的話，半平方公里或更大范圍內(nèi)的地方將會被它夷為平地。憑借這股動能和朝四面八方飛射的彈片，其造成的破壞將是極其驚人的。

4. This test/mistake also shows what China can expect at the LAC if they become too adventurous. The Chinese use mainly HQ 9s and also have a S 400 battery. But it seems India has 14000 of these Brahmos missiles which can fly at Mach 3+, they have been upgraded to a range of 500 kms (by changing their software) and if India launches 30 of these missiles at Chinese S 400 (an attack called Saturation attack)the S 400 cannot handle it and would be blown to smithereens. Rajnath Singh had apparently said that India plans to.deploy 500 of these missiles along the LAC. The Chinese started whining and complaining that doing this would up the risk and they would also be forced to deploy their Hypersonic missiles. Which tells you how scared the Chinese are of this missile.
This is a good news for India. We are becoming self-sufficiency in defence at last.

這場測試或者說是錯誤也證明了，如果中國過于冒險，那么他們可以預(yù)期的到自己到時會在實控線那里遭遇到什么。中國人主要使用紅旗9和S400防空導(dǎo)彈。但印度似乎有14000枚布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈，其飛行速度可以達(dá)到3馬赫，可以通過改變軟件將射程提高到500公里，如果印度向中國發(fā)射30枚這樣的導(dǎo)彈（這樣的攻擊被稱為是飽和式攻擊），他們的S400將無法應(yīng)付，會被炸成碎片。拉杰納特·辛格（印度國防部長）曾公開說印度計劃沿實控線部署500枚這樣的導(dǎo)彈，中國人開始抱怨說這樣做會增加風(fēng)險，他們?yōu)榇藢⒈黄炔渴鹱约旱母叱羲賹?dǎo)彈。這說明了中國人有多么害怕印度的布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈
這對印度來說是一個好消息，我們的國防終于開始可以自給自足了
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Himanshu Kumar
Firing Brahmos on China means a full blown war, which will mean not just missiles and tanks.
Most of us just think of conventional weapons, that's the problem. Countries like China don't really follow the rules. We are yet to learn cyber and electronic warfare.

向中國發(fā)射布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈意味著全面戰(zhàn)爭，而全面戰(zhàn)爭不僅僅意味著坦克和導(dǎo)彈。我們大部分人只能想到常規(guī)武器，這就是問題所在，像中國這樣的國家不會遵守這些規(guī)則，我們現(xiàn)在連網(wǎng)絡(luò)戰(zhàn)和電子戰(zhàn)都還沒有學(xué)會

Vellanki Bharadwaj
So what are our options if China or Pakistan fires hypersonic missiles at us ?

如果中國或者巴基斯坦向我們發(fā)射高超音速導(dǎo)彈，我們有什么選擇？

Value Pilgrim
@Vellanki Bharadwaj Pakistan doesn't have even a supersonic missile forget a hypersonic one.
China has hypersonic missiles. If China decides to go hypersonic we have some options too. They are pretty lethal.
Also, I have an idea of how a Hypersonic missile can be neutralised. But then I don't know whom to tell.

巴基斯坦甚至連超音速導(dǎo)彈都沒有，更不用說高超音速導(dǎo)彈了。中國有高超音速導(dǎo)彈，如果中國決定使用高超音速導(dǎo)彈，我們也有一些選擇可以使用，而且這些選擇相當(dāng)致命。還有我知道如何壓制高超音速導(dǎo)彈，但我不知道和誰說。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Hon Dam
What about drones? India must develop drones.

還有無人機呢？印度必須發(fā)展無人機

QuadLogic
Although you did put in some good points, understand one thing China has an entire rocket division other than army, navy, airforce and cyber. Plus their rocket count is huge as well so saturation attack yes will happen on them but we would also bare much heavier one as our S400 batteries will also be wiped out, not a good situation. Best is the China factor be handled diplomatically.

雖然你提出了一些很好的觀點，但要知道除了陸軍，海軍空軍和網(wǎng)絡(luò)軍之外，中國還有完整的火箭軍。而且他們的火箭數(shù)量也很多，所以如果我們對他們發(fā)動了飽和式攻擊，我們自己也會受到更加沉重的打擊，我們的S400會被徹底抹除，這不是什么好事情。和中國解決矛盾的最佳辦法是通過外交途徑。

Eucenor
@Value Pilgrim laser weapons systems to stop hypersonic missiles?

激光武器系統(tǒng)可以阻止高超音速導(dǎo)彈嗎?

Simriths .S
@Vellanki Bharadwaj Pakistan cannot afford hypersonic missiles.

巴基斯坦無法負(fù)擔(dān)高超音速導(dǎo)彈
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

AARYAN
Can s400 sucessfully intercept nd kill down a BRAHMOS missile?

S400可以成功攔截并擊落布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈嗎？

oppindia
what is the source that India has 14000 Brahmos, it seems too high number.

你從哪里知道印度有14000枚布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈的，這個數(shù)字似乎太高了

Value Pilgrim
@Hon Dam Drones we have lagged so far. But recent advances (specially the Rustom II successful test) shows we are closing the gap. We should have some very good drones by 2024.

我們在無人機方面落后太大。但最近的進展表明（尤其是Rustom II的成功實驗）我們正在縮小差距。到2024年，我們應(yīng)該就能擁有非常先進的無人機了。

AARYAN
@Value Pilgrim
So 1 vs 1....s400 can't kill BRAHMOS. Right!?
Nd what if INDIA gives the BRAHMOS to other nation nd that nation fires BRAHMOS against INDIA?
Can India defend against BRAHMOS?
I think BARAK 8 can defend.

所以一對一的話，S400無法擊落布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈對吧？
如果印度將布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈給了別的國家，而那個國家又用布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈來攻擊印度的話，該怎么辦？印度可以防住布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈嗎？我認(rèn)為閃電8導(dǎo)彈可以防御住（是以色列和印度共同開發(fā)的區(qū)域防空導(dǎo)彈）

yoppindia
@Value Pilgrim I checked it's from 400 to 500(200 for navy, 288 for army)

我查了一下，布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈數(shù)量是在400枚到500枚之間，海軍200枚，陸軍288枚
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Value Pilgrim
@yoppindia google 14000 Brahmos.

谷歌一下14000枚布拉莫斯導(dǎo)彈

harilalt
I think it is 40000 feet not meters....

我認(rèn)為是40000英尺而不是40000米的高空

Vijay Rao
Great analysis. Knew it was more than a accidental launch

不錯的分析，我就知道這不是一次偶然的發(fā)射

印度 導(dǎo)彈 巴基斯坦

很贊 ( 1 )