F-35:太貴了,用不起,也損失不起
F-35: TOO EXPENSIVE TO USE. TOO EXPENSIVE TO LOSE譯文簡介
正如一位作者所言,F(xiàn)35 是美國史上最大的浪費(fèi),“ 太貴了,用不起,也損失不起”。
正文翻譯
The F35 is the greatest boondoggle in American history, as one writer says, “too expensive to use, too expensive to lose”. Over its lifespan, it will cost the American taxpayer $1.7 trillion. An F35B costs $138 million dollars and over $36,000 an hour to operate.
正如一位作者所言,F(xiàn)35 是美國史上最大的浪費(fèi),“ 太貴了,用不起,也損失不起”。
在其壽命期內(nèi),它將耗費(fèi)美國納稅人1.7萬億美元,一架 F35B 的成本為1.38億美元,每小時的運(yùn)營成本超過3.6萬美元。
Intended to replace the F16, the F35 is slow, maneuvers sluggishly and cannot fire its new lightweight Gatling without destroying the housing and the airplane. It suffers from 13 “class one” defects that endanger both the aircraft and its crew. And 871 flaws that must be corrected before it can be fully operational—in 5 years.
F35 打算取代 F16,但它速度慢,機(jī)動遲緩,還無法在不破壞外殼和飛機(jī)的情況下使用其新型輕加特林機(jī)炮,F(xiàn)35 存在13個危及戰(zhàn)機(jī)和機(jī)組人員的 "一級 "缺陷,還有871項(xiàng)缺陷,必須在5年內(nèi)糾正后才能完全投入使用。
F35 打算取代 F16,但它速度慢,機(jī)動遲緩,還無法在不破壞外殼和飛機(jī)的情況下使用其新型輕加特林機(jī)炮,F(xiàn)35 存在13個危及戰(zhàn)機(jī)和機(jī)組人員的 "一級 "缺陷,還有871項(xiàng)缺陷,必須在5年內(nèi)糾正后才能完全投入使用。
Still, the US has managed to force this aerial junk on a lot of its allies, most recently the UAE, which has prompted the Israelis who have two squadrons of the F35 and mostly use it for PR, to ask for the F22, which, of course, they can only afford to buy with American money.
不過,美國還是成功地把這種空中垃圾強(qiáng)加給了很多盟友,最近的一個是阿聯(lián)酋,這也促使擁有兩個 F35中隊(duì)的以色列人要求購買 F22,當(dāng)然,他們只會用美國的錢來買。
不過,美國還是成功地把這種空中垃圾強(qiáng)加給了很多盟友,最近的一個是阿聯(lián)酋,這也促使擁有兩個 F35中隊(duì)的以色列人要求購買 F22,當(dāng)然,他們只會用美國的錢來買。
Last year, there were reports that the Syrians had downed an F35 over Syria with a Soviet era S200. The Israelis claimed a bird did it—over Israel. Nobody really knows.
The Syrians certainly shot something down! And it wasn’t an…um…bird.
去年,有報道稱敘利亞人用蘇聯(lián)時代的 S200 在敘利亞上空擊落了一架 F35,以色列人聲稱是一只鳥干的,而且是在以色列空域——沒有人知道真相究竟如何。
敘利亞人肯定擊落了什么東西 ! 而且那不是一只 ... 呃 ... 鳥。
The Syrians certainly shot something down! And it wasn’t an…um…bird.
去年,有報道稱敘利亞人用蘇聯(lián)時代的 S200 在敘利亞上空擊落了一架 F35,以色列人聲稱是一只鳥干的,而且是在以色列空域——沒有人知道真相究竟如何。
敘利亞人肯定擊落了什么東西 ! 而且那不是一只 ... 呃 ... 鳥。
However, it is unlikely that the Israelis are using the F35 over Syria. Losing an F35 to the Syrians–especially to a large anti-Zionist Syrian crow – would be too big embarrassment. Most IDF strikes inside Syria seem to have been carried out by F16s, which are faster, carry more ordinance and have the maneuverability to avoid incoming missiles if they detect them early enough.
然而,以色列不太可能在敘利亞使用 F35,損失一架 F35戰(zhàn)機(jī),輸給敘利亞人,尤其是輸給一群反猶太復(fù)國主義的敘利亞人,將會非常尷尬。多數(shù)以色列國防軍在敘利亞境內(nèi)發(fā)動的空襲都是由 F16戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)執(zhí)行的,這種戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)速度更快,攜帶更多的彈藥,如果能盡早發(fā)現(xiàn)來襲的導(dǎo)彈,以其機(jī)動性,可以避開來襲的導(dǎo)彈。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
然而,以色列不太可能在敘利亞使用 F35,損失一架 F35戰(zhàn)機(jī),輸給敘利亞人,尤其是輸給一群反猶太復(fù)國主義的敘利亞人,將會非常尷尬。多數(shù)以色列國防軍在敘利亞境內(nèi)發(fā)動的空襲都是由 F16戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)執(zhí)行的,這種戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)速度更快,攜帶更多的彈藥,如果能盡早發(fā)現(xiàn)來襲的導(dǎo)彈,以其機(jī)動性,可以避開來襲的導(dǎo)彈。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Another point….
Gen. Tod Wolters, who leads U.S. European Command, offered this explanation:
還有一點(diǎn).......
美國歐洲司令部司令托德·沃爾特斯將軍給出了這樣的解釋:
Gen. Tod Wolters, who leads U.S. European Command, offered this explanation:
還有一點(diǎn).......
美國歐洲司令部司令托德·沃爾特斯將軍給出了這樣的解釋:
“You cannot operate an F-35 in the vicinity of an S-400. They won’t talk to each other, and what the two systems will attempt to do, certainly the S-400 against the F-35, is attempt to exploit the F-35’s capabilities.”
“你不能在 S-400 附近使用F35,這兩系統(tǒng)是不對付的,S-400 如果對上 F35,顯然 S-400 會利用機(jī)會測試和尋找F35的漏洞?!?/b>
“你不能在 S-400 附近使用F35,這兩系統(tǒng)是不對付的,S-400 如果對上 F35,顯然 S-400 會利用機(jī)會測試和尋找F35的漏洞?!?/b>
The US, of course, has been using the F22 in Eastern Syria and Iraq within range of Russian systems, which now reportedly can detect even this more capable stealth aircraft.
當(dāng)然,美國一直在敘利亞東部和伊拉克使用 F22,且在俄羅斯的防空系統(tǒng)范圍內(nèi),據(jù)報道現(xiàn)在連F22這種能力更強(qiáng)的隱身飛機(jī)都能探測到。
當(dāng)然,美國一直在敘利亞東部和伊拉克使用 F22,且在俄羅斯的防空系統(tǒng)范圍內(nèi),據(jù)報道現(xiàn)在連F22這種能力更強(qiáng)的隱身飛機(jī)都能探測到。
Yes, the Americans tried out the F35 in Afghanistan, since locals throwing rocks weren’t much of a threat. The sales point of the F35 is “stealth”, which is only fine–when your opponent doesn’t have much in the way of advanced radar equipment.
是的,美國人在阿富汗試用了 F35,因?yàn)楫?dāng)?shù)厝巳邮^并不構(gòu)成威脅,F(xiàn)35的賣點(diǎn)是“隱形”,但這只有在你的對手沒有太多先進(jìn)雷達(dá)設(shè)備的情況下才行。
是的,美國人在阿富汗試用了 F35,因?yàn)楫?dāng)?shù)厝巳邮^并不構(gòu)成威脅,F(xiàn)35的賣點(diǎn)是“隱形”,但這只有在你的對手沒有太多先進(jìn)雷達(dá)設(shè)備的情況下才行。
“Stealth” is not invisibility.
“隱形”并非不可見
“隱形”并非不可見
An S400 real time anti-stealth radar system can certainly pick up even a large bird-sized obxt, at 150 km, especially when moving at 700km per hour, which is a giveaway.
一套S400實(shí)時反隱身雷達(dá)系統(tǒng),在150公里的距離上,肯定能探測到哪怕是鳥類大小的物體,尤其是這個物體還以700公里每小時的速度移動時,必然會暴露,這就是送死。
一套S400實(shí)時反隱身雷達(dá)系統(tǒng),在150公里的距離上,肯定能探測到哪怕是鳥類大小的物體,尤其是這個物體還以700公里每小時的速度移動時,必然會暴露,這就是送死。
The Russians have yet to allow S300 or S400 launches in Syria thanks to a tacit agreement with the Israelis not to exacerbate regional tensions: so, it is not just that the very, very pragmatic Israelis don’t want to use the unreliable F35 over Syria, whose antiaircraft systems to be so much more sophisticated than, say, Lebanon—they don’t want to provoke the Russians.
俄羅斯尚未允許 S300 或 S400 在敘利亞開火,這要?dú)w功于以色列與俄羅斯達(dá)成了不加劇地區(qū)緊張局勢的默契 :
因此,極度務(wù)實(shí)的以色列不想在敘利亞上空使用不可靠的 F35,敘利亞的防空系統(tǒng)要比黎巴嫩復(fù)雜得多——而且他們也不想激怒俄國人。
俄羅斯尚未允許 S300 或 S400 在敘利亞開火,這要?dú)w功于以色列與俄羅斯達(dá)成了不加劇地區(qū)緊張局勢的默契 :
因此,極度務(wù)實(shí)的以色列不想在敘利亞上空使用不可靠的 F35,敘利亞的防空系統(tǒng)要比黎巴嫩復(fù)雜得多——而且他們也不想激怒俄國人。
The last time they did that, the Russians supplied the Syrians with the S300–albeit keeping control of these systems. The warning is obvious: there are redlines.
上一次他們這樣做,俄羅斯人向敘利亞人提供了S300——盡管俄羅斯保持了對這些系統(tǒng)的控制, 警告很明顯:勿踩紅線。
上一次他們這樣做,俄羅斯人向敘利亞人提供了S300——盡管俄羅斯保持了對這些系統(tǒng)的控制, 警告很明顯:勿踩紅線。
The Pentagon doesn’t really want this dog. Dogs don’t fly.
五角大樓不想要這只狗——這狗它不會飛啊。
五角大樓不想要這只狗——這狗它不會飛啊。
But, as in the Yeltsin years in Russia, the US government works for the nation’s oligarchs, a country for Big Tech, by Big Tech, of Big Tech.
但是,就像在葉利欽時代的俄羅斯一樣,美國政府為這個國家的寡頭們工作,這個國家為大科技公司服務(wù),由大科技公司管理,為大科技公司所有。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
但是,就像在葉利欽時代的俄羅斯一樣,美國政府為這個國家的寡頭們工作,這個國家為大科技公司服務(wù),由大科技公司管理,為大科技公司所有。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
The nation’s “defense” industry is a malapropism: all its wars are offensive. If the weapons don’t work too well — it doesn’t matter–because the US doesn’t fight anyone but third world countries. The more expensive and complicated the weapons are, the better it is for he companies that make them. How else can a poor CEO buy that second island in the Caribbean and a new private jet?
美國的 "國防 "工業(yè)是一個惡性循環(huán):它所有的戰(zhàn)爭都是進(jìn)攻性的,如果武器不太好用——也無所謂——因?yàn)槊绹说谌澜鐕?,誰也不打。
武器越昂貴、越復(fù)雜,對制造武器的公司就越有利,否則,一個可憐的CEO怎么能買得下加勒比海兩個島嶼、一架新私人飛機(jī)?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
美國的 "國防 "工業(yè)是一個惡性循環(huán):它所有的戰(zhàn)爭都是進(jìn)攻性的,如果武器不太好用——也無所謂——因?yàn)槊绹说谌澜鐕?,誰也不打。
武器越昂貴、越復(fù)雜,對制造武器的公司就越有利,否則,一個可憐的CEO怎么能買得下加勒比海兩個島嶼、一架新私人飛機(jī)?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
It also doesn’t matter that the America lost to little Vietnam, ended up losing Iraq to Iran, and soon leave Afghanistan, its tail between its legs. It is even losing in Yemen.
美國輸給了小小的越南,輸給了伊拉克,輸給了伊朗,最后,很快又要夾著尾巴離開阿富汗, 甚至在也門也輸?shù)囊凰浚贿^這些都無關(guān)緊要。
美國輸給了小小的越南,輸給了伊拉克,輸給了伊朗,最后,很快又要夾著尾巴離開阿富汗, 甚至在也門也輸?shù)囊凰浚贿^這些都無關(guān)緊要。
Of course, bullying other countries is more of a problem when your equipment doesn’t work. The new USS Ford, super carrier in the South China Sea? It can’t launch its aircraft. The UK’s new carrier which is supposed to show the flag against China? Its F35Bs can’t fire their guns. In any case, carriers are nice targets for hypersonic missiles.
當(dāng)然,當(dāng)你的裝備不行的時候,欺負(fù)別的國家就要更麻煩一點(diǎn)。
游弋南中國的新超級航母福特號?——它不能彈射飛機(jī)。
英國的新航母,本來是要對中國亮出旗幟的? —— 它的F35B沒法使用機(jī)炮。
不管怎樣,航母都是高超音速導(dǎo)彈的好目標(biāo)。
當(dāng)然,當(dāng)你的裝備不行的時候,欺負(fù)別的國家就要更麻煩一點(diǎn)。
游弋南中國的新超級航母福特號?——它不能彈射飛機(jī)。
英國的新航母,本來是要對中國亮出旗幟的? —— 它的F35B沒法使用機(jī)炮。
不管怎樣,航母都是高超音速導(dǎo)彈的好目標(biāo)。
The Russians and Chinese do defense differently – because for them it actually is defense.
俄羅斯人和中國人的“國防”防御方式不同——因?yàn)閷λ麄儊碚f,國防是真國防。
俄羅斯人和中國人的“國防”防御方式不同——因?yàn)閷λ麄儊碚f,國防是真國防。
When Putin took over, he made it clear to the oligarchs who previously owned the country that they either deferred to the State, or got out. Some went to prison. Some got out. Russia is still very unequal but the Rich toe the line just as they do in China.
普京上臺后,他向曾經(jīng)擁有這個國家的寡頭們明確表示,他們要么聽命于國家,要么滾出去,有些人進(jìn)了監(jiān)獄,有些人逃了出來,盡管俄羅斯仍然非常不平等,但是其富人和中國富人一樣,遵規(guī)守矩。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
普京上臺后,他向曾經(jīng)擁有這個國家的寡頭們明確表示,他們要么聽命于國家,要么滾出去,有些人進(jìn)了監(jiān)獄,有些人逃了出來,盡管俄羅斯仍然非常不平等,但是其富人和中國富人一樣,遵規(guī)守矩。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
When the Ministry of Defense is not satisfied with a military product, either in terms of cost or performance, it simply cuts orders. This was the case with the Su57. Originally, the government had envisioned putting up to 250 of these aircraft into service by 2025. Now, Russia will get 76 aircraft at a 20% reduction in cost, with better engines, hypersonic weapons, electronics, improved stealth and general finish.
在俄羅斯,當(dāng)俄國防部對軍事不滿意時,別管你是成本問題還是性能問題,都會直接削減訂單,蘇57就是這種情況,原本,政府設(shè)想在2025年之前將多達(dá)250架這種戰(zhàn)機(jī)投入使用,但現(xiàn)在,俄羅斯只采購76架,成本降低了20%,配備了更好的發(fā)動機(jī)、高超音速武器、電子設(shè)備,改進(jìn)了隱身性和總體完成度。
在俄羅斯,當(dāng)俄國防部對軍事不滿意時,別管你是成本問題還是性能問題,都會直接削減訂單,蘇57就是這種情況,原本,政府設(shè)想在2025年之前將多達(dá)250架這種戰(zhàn)機(jī)投入使用,但現(xiàn)在,俄羅斯只采購76架,成本降低了20%,配備了更好的發(fā)動機(jī)、高超音速武器、電子設(shè)備,改進(jìn)了隱身性和總體完成度。
And the Su57 will cost about $35 to $40 million each compared to the 138 million of the 35B or the $300 million of an F22. One reason for the discrepancy is that US companies expect the taxpayer to pay R&D and developmental costs, which are added to the flyaway cost. Of course, the companies use that R&D for lucrative commercial projects as well.
蘇57每架成本約為3500萬至4000萬美元,而 F35B 的造價是1.38億美元,F(xiàn)22更是高達(dá)3億美元。
造成這種差異的一個原因是,美國公司希望納稅人支付研發(fā)和開發(fā)費(fèi)用,而這些費(fèi)用是加在成本中的,當(dāng)然,這些公司也會把這些研發(fā)費(fèi)用用于利潤豐厚的商業(yè)項(xiàng)目。
蘇57每架成本約為3500萬至4000萬美元,而 F35B 的造價是1.38億美元,F(xiàn)22更是高達(dá)3億美元。
造成這種差異的一個原因是,美國公司希望納稅人支付研發(fā)和開發(fā)費(fèi)用,而這些費(fèi)用是加在成本中的,當(dāng)然,這些公司也會把這些研發(fā)費(fèi)用用于利潤豐厚的商業(yè)項(xiàng)目。
Russia doesn’t have money to spare. It is still recovering from the Yelsin years and massive inequality. So it keeps defense companies in line.
俄羅斯沒有多余的錢。它仍然處于從葉利欽時代和巨大的不平等中恢復(fù)過來的過程中,因此,它讓國防企業(yè)守住規(guī)矩。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
俄羅斯沒有多余的錢。它仍然處于從葉利欽時代和巨大的不平等中恢復(fù)過來的過程中,因此,它讓國防企業(yè)守住規(guī)矩。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
The Su57 is a good example but also the T-14 (Armata) tank, where orders were slashed until the contractor promised to a. reduce costs; b. address performance issues.
蘇57是一個很好的例子,T-14 ( 阿瑪塔 ) 坦克也是 ,其訂單被削減,直到承包商承諾:a. 降低成本;b. 解決性能問題。
蘇57是一個很好的例子,T-14 ( 阿瑪塔 ) 坦克也是 ,其訂單被削減,直到承包商承諾:a. 降低成本;b. 解決性能問題。
Putin made clear that Russia is a developing democracy. In the end, the people will rule, oligarchs or not.
普京明確表示,俄羅斯是一個發(fā)展中的民主國家,不管有沒有寡頭,這個國家都將由人民來統(tǒng)治。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
普京明確表示,俄羅斯是一個發(fā)展中的民主國家,不管有沒有寡頭,這個國家都將由人民來統(tǒng)治。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
By contrast, the US is an “inverted totalitarian state”, or, if you like a “managed” democracy. It is not really a modern state in germs of governance, since it is defined by an 18th Century constitution and institutions, designed to prevent rather than enable democratic rule. The US loved Yeltsin because his “system” was really theirs.
相比之下,美國是一個“倒置的極權(quán)國家”—— 如果你喜歡的話,也可以用“有管理的”民主國家這個說法。
它并不是一個真正的現(xiàn)代國家,因?yàn)樗怯?8世紀(jì)的憲法和制度定義的,旨在防止而不是促成民主統(tǒng)治。
美國喜歡葉利欽,因?yàn)樗摹绑w制”實(shí)際上是他們的。
相比之下,美國是一個“倒置的極權(quán)國家”—— 如果你喜歡的話,也可以用“有管理的”民主國家這個說法。
它并不是一個真正的現(xiàn)代國家,因?yàn)樗怯?8世紀(jì)的憲法和制度定義的,旨在防止而不是促成民主統(tǒng)治。
美國喜歡葉利欽,因?yàn)樗摹绑w制”實(shí)際上是他們的。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 3 )
收藏
"Most IDF strikes inside Syria seem to have been carried out by F16s, which are faster, carry more ordinance and have the maneuverability to avoid incoming missiles if they detect them early enough."
Untrue. IAF attacks use stand-off missiles fired from either Lebanese airspace or from the Eastern Mediterrean Sea. Their aircraft don't enter Syrian airspace as its now too dangerous.
“多數(shù)以色列國防軍在敘利亞境內(nèi)發(fā)動的空襲都是由 F16戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)執(zhí)行的,這種戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)速度更快,攜帶更多的彈藥,如果能盡早發(fā)現(xiàn)來襲的導(dǎo)彈,以其機(jī)動性,可以避開來襲的導(dǎo)彈?!?br /> ——這個說法不對,以色列空軍攻擊使用的是從黎巴嫩領(lǐng)空或東地中海發(fā)射的導(dǎo)彈,他們的飛機(jī)不能進(jìn)入敘利亞領(lǐng)空,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)在太危險了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://nxnpts.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Right, after a Zionistani F 16 was eliminated by an old Syrian S200 they no longer enter Syrian airspace.
對,一架猶太復(fù)國主義份子的F16 被敘利亞老式的 S200 擊落后,他們不再進(jìn)入敘利亞領(lǐng)空。
F-35 the aircraft that became the poster boy representing "The Sunk Cost Fallacy."
It's like US military is determined to lose the war it's provoking against an alliance of countries US cannot defeat in conventional war.
US has no advantage in using its nukes, any launch of nuclear weapons towards Russia, and/or allies, initiates a counter-attack that is targeting US Strategic Command Centers, ICBM bases, and decision making centers. Russia has it's hypersonic weapons deployed, while US can track these incoming, it has no defense.
The chance Western nukes will reach their targets is slim, given the speed, and accuracy of Russian defenses, the incoming nukes will be intercepted before reaching Russia's border's. Those launched from EU bases.
The West does have it's big military, spread thin worldwide, and at the ends of long lines of communications. Very expensive logistics, and very vulnerable to disruption by enemy action.
The military technology is old much of it not upgradable, eight plus years of deferred maintenance, no replacements for hardware being retired from service, and of the new technology that exists exactly none of it comes close to being serviceable. Unfit for combat, unreliable, continuously breaking down, needing to be towed back to port, for repair. Prone to catching fire, the carrier Ford is still undergoing trials over the next 4 year's, still can't launch aircraft. This is pitiful.
There's no means to manufacture domestically this was moved offshore, last count US has 180(+/-) million unemployed since the 2006 crash. No jobs have returned, these people lost everything, and are dependent on Government assistance for survival. No one in the vicinity of their right mind wants to be dependent on our beloved Government for anything, to be dependent for survival needs is beyond terrifying
F-35這款戰(zhàn)機(jī)成了"沉沒成本謬論 "的典型代表。
看上去美國軍隊(duì)決意要輸?shù)羲羝鸬膽?zhàn)爭,而這場戰(zhàn)爭針對的是美國在常規(guī)戰(zhàn)爭中無法打敗的國家的聯(lián)盟。
美國在使用核武器方面沒有任何優(yōu)勢,任何向俄羅斯及其盟友發(fā)射核武器的舉動,都會引發(fā)反擊,其目標(biāo)會是美國的戰(zhàn)略指揮中心、洲際彈道導(dǎo)彈基地和決策中心,俄羅斯已經(jīng)部署了高超音速武器,盡管美國可以跟蹤來襲的核彈,但它沒有防御能力。
鑒于俄羅斯導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)的速度和準(zhǔn)確度,西方的核武器成功打擊目標(biāo)的可能性很小,核彈在飛抵俄羅斯邊境之前就會被攔截。
西方確實(shí)擁有龐大的軍事力量,但軍力稀疏的分散在世界各地,并處于長線通訊的末端,后勤非常昂貴,而且非常容易被敵人的行動所破壞,軍事裝備已經(jīng)陳舊,大部分無法升級,八年多的延遲維護(hù)期,退役的裝備沒有替代品,新技術(shù)要么完全不存在,要么根本無法使用,有些裝備不再適合作戰(zhàn),也不可靠,不斷的出現(xiàn)故障,軍艦需要拖回港口進(jìn)行維修,起火事件頻頻發(fā)生,在未來4年的時間里,福特號航母依然必須進(jìn)行試驗(yàn),也不能彈射戰(zhàn)機(jī),太可憐了。
國內(nèi)沒辦法生產(chǎn),制造業(yè)都搬到國外去了,統(tǒng)計顯示,自2006年股災(zāi)以來,美國累計有約1.8億人失業(yè)。
工作崗位沒有回來,這些人失去了一切,靠政府救濟(jì)生存,沒有哪個心智正常的人愿意在任何事情上都依賴我們的政府,為了生存需要而依賴政府是無比可怕的。
US has the largest defense budget, by that virtue alone the F35 should be one of the best platforms in the US military....
One Air Force general argued before the congress that the A10 had to be retired to make room for F35 that had superior air to ground capability.
美國擁有全世界最大的國防預(yù)算,單憑這一點(diǎn),F(xiàn)35就應(yīng)該是美國軍隊(duì)最好的作戰(zhàn)平臺之一.........
一位空軍將領(lǐng)在國會上辯稱,A10必須退役,以便為擁有更優(yōu)越的空對地能力的F35騰出空間。
I don't know about the F-35 being too expensive to lose, the F-22 maybe, the B-2 definitely. The fear the F-35 has is that the world will find out it's stealth is overrated if it tries to go into well-defended airspace anytime soon. Then Lock-Mart would lose contracts and it would drive the cost of the aircraft up further. The US 'defence' (offense) industry is purely focused on profit after all.
我不知道F-35算不算太貴,F(xiàn)-22也許有點(diǎn)貴,但 B-2 是肯定貴。
F-35最讓人擔(dān)心的是,如果它試圖進(jìn)入防衛(wèi)嚴(yán)密的空域,世界很快會發(fā)現(xiàn)它的隱身性被高估了,那么洛馬就會失去合同,而且會使飛機(jī)的成本進(jìn)一步上升,美國的“國防”(進(jìn)攻)工業(yè)畢竟是純粹以利潤為中心的。
Well, well,
Southfront finally admits in this article that the Syrians have NO CONTROL over the S-300s that the Russians DID NOT GIVE to the Syrians because the Syrians CANNOT USE them.
There was not even a PR nor propaganda reason to fake giving something which doesn't work to one's ally. Therefore, the ONLY REASON the Russians are admitting their perfidy is because it was discovered and leaked to the public. The Russians are trying to rationalize their treachery by suggesting that they have a deal with Israel. Even then the Russians are shooting themselves in the foot because that constitues a glaring admission that the Russians' REAL ALLY is Israel and NOT Syria. How else could the Russians collaborate with the Jews and enable the Israelis to bomb and kill the Syrians with impunity?
Dear friends,
Do you realize that Russia, Israel and NATO in collaboration effectively emptied Syria of its civilized population, with only Assad-administration-friendly forces and their families left, fighting against the depraved Muslim terrorists of ISIS et al?
Putin is collaborating with Erdogan and the Turks to commit GENO.... in Syria. Putin and the Russians have BLOCKED the application to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in order to prosecute the Turks' horrible crimes against humanity and GENO.... which Turkey has committed in Afrin, Syria
好吧好吧,
南方陣線最終在這篇文章中承認(rèn),對俄羅斯人給的S300,敘利亞人沒有控制權(quán),因?yàn)閿⒗麃喨瞬荒苁褂盟鼈儭?br /> 俄羅斯人假意給予了一堆對自己的盟友不起作用的東西,甚至連個起碼的公關(guān)或宣傳的理由都欠奉,俄羅斯承認(rèn)其背信棄義的唯一原因是因?yàn)镾300被發(fā)現(xiàn)并泄露給了公眾,俄羅斯人暗示他們與以色列達(dá)成了協(xié)議,試圖為他們的背信棄義找借口。
即便如此,俄羅斯人還是在搬起石頭砸自己的腳,因?yàn)檫@顯然表明,俄羅斯真正的盟友是以色列,而不是敘利亞,否則俄羅斯人怎么可能與猶太人合作,讓以色列人可以不受懲罰地轟炸和殺害敘利亞人 ?
親愛的朋友,
你是否意識到,俄羅斯、以色列和北約在合作中實(shí)際上將敘利亞的文明人口一掃而空,只留下支持阿薩德政府的武裝力量及其家人與邪惡的伊斯蘭國等穆斯林恐怖分子作戰(zhàn)?
普京正在與埃爾多安和土耳其合作,在敘利亞實(shí)施種族滅絕,為了阻止土耳其因在敘利亞 Afrin 犯下的可怕的反人類罪和種族滅絕罪而起訴,普京和俄羅斯封鎖了國際刑事法院(ICC) 提出的申請。
I have argued that Putin's long-game is to replace the "US" as Israel's protector. Ties between Israel and Russia run very deep. Given the historic blood relations with Russia and the rich intellectual resources of Israel, Putin would only paint himself as an international fool by seeking to alienate or destroy Israel entirely by dealing them a heavy hand.
But this is only problematic for those who do not make a distinction between the Jewish people and the handful of parasitic, sociopaths known as Zionist "Jews" who only seek to serve their own dark interests of power and control.
With the unmistakable power shift going on in the Middle East in conjunction with the unraveling of domestic politics in the "US" and any semblance of national cohesion, it is only a matter of time before the Washington regime is unable to defend Israel's interests and this transition to Russia will begin.
It may be somewhat gradual. But should conditions change too rapidly, we can be sure that contingency plans are already in place to welcome Russian paratroopers onto Israeli soil and for mass evacuations of Israeli citizens to Russia through well defined air corridors. For Jews in Israel nothing is unthinkable.
The real question is whether Russia can check the rabid and toxic influence of the Zionists once this historic transition occurs. If not, it will be Russia's road to ruin, just like the "US".
我曾說過,普京的長期目標(biāo)是取代“美國”,成為以色列的保護(hù)者,以色列和俄羅斯的關(guān)系非常深厚,鑒于與俄羅斯歷史上的血緣關(guān)系,以及以色列豐富的智力資源,通過對以色列采取強(qiáng)硬手段,試圖徹底疏遠(yuǎn)或摧毀以色列,普京只會把自己變成一個國際傻瓜。
但對于那些不區(qū)分猶太人和被稱為猶太復(fù)國主義者的少數(shù)寄生的、反社會的“猶太人”的人來說是有問題的,他們只想為自己的權(quán)力和控制的黑暗利益服務(wù)。
隨著中東地區(qū)明顯的權(quán)力轉(zhuǎn)移,以及“美國”國內(nèi)政治的瓦解,華盛頓政權(quán)無力捍衛(wèi)以色列的利益只是時間問題,這種向俄羅斯的過渡即將開始,這只是一個時間問題。
這可能是漸進(jìn)的,但是,如果情況變化太快,我們可以肯定,應(yīng)急計劃已經(jīng)到位,以色列將歡迎俄羅斯傘兵進(jìn)入以色列領(lǐng)土,并通過明確界定的空中走廊大規(guī)模疏散以色列公民到俄羅斯,對于以色列的猶太人來說,沒有什么是不可想象的。
真正的問題是,一旦這一歷史性的轉(zhuǎn)變發(fā)生,俄羅斯能否遏制猶太復(fù)國主義者的狂熱和有害影響,否則,這將是俄羅斯的毀滅之路,就像“美國”一樣。
US is in decline and its military has always been all Hollywood hype. The F-35 is an unmitigated $2 trillion boondoogle in a unprofessional airforce used to bombing civilians in countries that can't fight back.
美國正在衰落,其軍事力量滿滿的都是好萊塢的炒作,F(xiàn)-35是一款價值2萬億美元的非專業(yè)戰(zhàn)機(jī),用于轟炸那些無法反擊的國家的平民。
Did you see that Amerikastan wants to make India join NATO? I doubt even Modi is stupid enough for that.
你沒看到美國想讓印度加入北約嗎? 我懷疑連莫迪都不會蠢到那個地步。
Modi wouldnt hesitate 2 seconds. Remember India's national sport is cricket......LOL.
莫迪不會猶豫的,記住印度的國民運(yùn)動是板球...... 哈哈哈.....
Could you imagine the absolute riddicule that would be poured on the F35 by western main stream media if it had been manufactured by Russia?The cartoons in the newspapers alone would have been endless
你能想象假如 F35是俄羅斯制造的,西方主流媒體會把絕對會瘋狂吐槽 F35,光是報紙上的漫畫就沒完沒了。
A couple of notes that have been well hidden by the fake-media main stream, an American general, one of the few remaining sane, wrote a couple of years ago that the US had lost the missile competition with the Soviets already in the 1950s and it has gotten worse ever since.
When the berlin wall fell the NATO military was able to test and study the Soviet planes of Eastern European nations that passed to the western side, the comments were that Westerners were lucky not to have collided with the Soviets, whose planes clearly outclassed the western ones.
It is for this reason that from industries that have always aimed exclusively at profit instead of product quality, guaranteed profits thanks to political corruption and monopolistic positions, one could not expect I do not say excellence but not even a minimum of efficiency, in fact all the new weapons systems produced or put into service in this century have been colossal failures, except for the MIC industries that have made exaggerated profits, the Fake 35 is just one among many such cases, which respect the same modus fraudulent operands.
有幾條信息被虛假主流媒體隱藏得很好,一位美國將軍,也是僅存的幾個正常人之一,幾年前寫道,美國在上世紀(jì)50年代就已經(jīng)在與蘇聯(lián)的導(dǎo)彈競爭中敗下陣來,此后情況越來越糟。
柏林墻倒塌后,北約軍方測試和研究東歐國家的蘇聯(lián)飛機(jī),他們的評論是,西方人很幸運(yùn),沒有和蘇聯(lián)人撞上,他們的飛機(jī)明顯比西方人的飛機(jī)強(qiáng)。
正是由于這個原因,對于那些總是專注于利潤而不是產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量、由于政治腐敗和壟斷地位而保證利潤的軍工企業(yè),我沒法指望它們有什么出色表現(xiàn),甚至不指望它們有最低限度的效率——事實(shí)上,除了軍工企業(yè)獲得了夸張的利潤,本世紀(jì)所有生產(chǎn)或投入使用的新武器系統(tǒng)都是巨大的失敗,假F35只是許多這樣的案例中的一個,都采用同樣的欺詐性操作手法。
the worlds most expensive kamikaze planes
世界上最昂貴的神風(fēng)特攻飛機(jī)。
I love the F35. I hope Amerikastan spends all its money making them!
我喜歡 F35,我希望美利堅(jiān)斯坦把所有的錢都花在它們身上!
Looks like Russia won't even need to develop the S-500 anymore
看起來俄羅斯都不需要再開發(fā) S-500了。
This is the state of US MIC, for the last three decades money was spent to the tune of hundreds of billions....and trillions without producing any adequate weapons that are viable. The trend is not going to change in the future as Russia and China press for new technologically advanced weaponry, while US will run its mouth and paint itself into a delusional reality.
這就是美國軍事實(shí)力的現(xiàn)狀,在過去的30年里,我們花了數(shù)千億美元.... 數(shù)萬億美元,卻沒有生產(chǎn)任何足夠有效的武器,這一趨勢在未來不會改變,因?yàn)槎砹_斯和中國迫切需要新的、技術(shù)先進(jìn)的武器,而美國將滿嘴跑火車,把自己描繪成一個虛幻的現(xiàn)實(shí)。
Believe it or not, it actually gets worse - the USAF uses F-35A variant - this is the only one of the three F-35 variants that has the 25mm gun located internally, the other two variants hang it on the outside. But when the F-35A fires the internal gun, apart from being unacceptably inaccurate, it actually causes structural damage to the aircraft...!
信不信由你,實(shí)際上情況更糟了——美國空軍使用的是F-35A改型——這是三種F-35改型中唯一一種將25mm機(jī)炮安裝在內(nèi)部的機(jī)型,其他兩種改型將其外掛在機(jī)身上,但是當(dāng)F-35A內(nèi)置機(jī)炮開火時,除了不可接受的不準(zhǔn)確之外,事實(shí)上還會對飛機(jī)造成結(jié)構(gòu)性損傷 !